Last updated: 2024-12-02
Checks: 7 0
Knit directory:
madi-biostat-project3-SDY8003-Thailand/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.1). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
The command set.seed(20231106) was run prior to running
the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results
that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are
reproducible.
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.
Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version 03a267b. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for
the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results
(you can use wflow_publish or
wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown
file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it
depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results
were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .DS_Store
Ignored: .RData
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: analysis/.DS_Store
Ignored: data/.DS_Store
Ignored: figure/
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were
made to the R Markdown
(analysis/loop_pca_nosigg_matpm_noEL7.Rmd) and HTML
(docs/loop_pca_nosigg_matpm_noEL7.html) files. If you’ve
configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote),
click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they
were in that past version.
| File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rmd | 03a267b | alecbuetow | 2024-12-02 | updated loops with feature clusters |
| Rmd | c432a7f | Michael S. Zens | 2024-09-16 | added feature_comparisions and fixed the deimension reduction for 6 variations of clustering for each manuscript. |
Features: PT_ADCD, PT_ADCP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG, PT_IgG1, PT_ADNP, PT_IgG3, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.424 | 1.116 | 0.942 | 0.858 | 0.657 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.588 | 0.125 | 0.089 | 0.074 | 0.043 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.588 | 0.712 | 0.801 | 0.875 | 0.918 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PT PC1: p=.38
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PT PC2: p=.0032
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PT UMAP1: p=.5
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PT UMAP2: p=.23
Features: FHA_ADCD, FHA_ADNP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, FHA_IgG1, FHA_ADCP, FHA_IgG, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG3, FHA_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.260 | 1.210 | 0.986 | 0.781 | 0.722 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.511 | 0.146 | 0.097 | 0.061 | 0.052 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.511 | 0.657 | 0.755 | 0.816 | 0.868 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated FHA PC1: p=.63
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated FHA PC2: p<.0001
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated FHA UMAP1: p=.48
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated FHA UMAP2: p=.64
Features: PRN_ADCD, PRN_ADNP, PRN_ADCP, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PRN_IgG, PRN_IgG1, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG3, PRN_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.310 | 1.038 | 0.961 | 0.885 | 0.827 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.534 | 0.108 | 0.092 | 0.078 | 0.068 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.534 | 0.642 | 0.734 | 0.812 | 0.881 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PRN PC1: p=.34
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PRN PC2: p=.22
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PRN UMAP1: p=.28
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PRN UMAP2: p=.38
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_IgG, DT_IgG1, DT_ADCP, DT_IgG2, DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG3, DT_ADNP, DT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.930 | 1.263 | 1.113 | 1.040 | 0.852 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.372 | 0.159 | 0.124 | 0.108 | 0.073 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.372 | 0.532 | 0.656 | 0.764 | 0.836 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated DT PC1: p=.63
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated DT PC2: p=.002
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated DT UMAP1: p=.91
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated DT UMAP2: p=.019
Features: TT_ADCD, TT_IgG2, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP, TT_FcgR2a, TT_FcgR3b, TT_IgG, TT_IgG1, TT_IgG3, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.393 | 1.161 | 0.970 | 0.699 | 0.657 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.572 | 0.135 | 0.094 | 0.049 | 0.043 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.572 | 0.707 | 0.801 | 0.850 | 0.894 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT PC1: p=.0017
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT PC2: p=.66
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.026
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.0088
Features: DT_IgG2, FHA_IgG2, TT_IgG2, PRN_IgG2, PT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, FHA_IgG4, PRN_IgG4, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.833 | 1.231 | 1.114 | 1.036 | 0.947 | 0.749 | 0.692 | 0.633 | 0.527 | 0.440 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.336 | 0.152 | 0.124 | 0.107 | 0.090 | 0.056 | 0.048 | 0.040 | 0.028 | 0.019 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.336 | 0.488 | 0.612 | 0.719 | 0.809 | 0.865 | 0.913 | 0.953 | 0.981 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC1:
p=.1
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC2:
p=.0065
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.023
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.056
Features: DT_ADCD, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, TT_ADCD, PT_ADCD
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.851 | 0.881 | 0.672 | 0.459 | 0.367 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.686 | 0.155 | 0.090 | 0.042 | 0.027 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.686 | 0.841 | 0.931 | 0.973 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster ADCD PC1:
p=.023
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster ADCD PC2: p=.94
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.92
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.7
Features: FHA_ADNP, PRN_ADNP, PT_ADCP, DT_ADCP, FHA_ADCP, PRN_ADCP, PT_ADNP, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP, DT_ADNP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.707 | 1.228 | 1.088 | 1.020 | 0.944 | 0.886 | 0.814 | 0.692 | 0.590 | 0.436 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.291 | 0.151 | 0.118 | 0.104 | 0.089 | 0.078 | 0.066 | 0.048 | 0.035 | 0.019 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.291 | 0.442 | 0.561 | 0.665 | 0.754 | 0.832 | 0.898 | 0.946 | 0.981 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC1:
p=.1
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC2:
p=.0018
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.19
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.29
Features: FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR2a, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.451 | 1.279 | 0.951 | 0.826 | 0.679 | 0.402 | 0.241 | 0.226 | 0.158 | 0.116 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.601 | 0.164 | 0.090 | 0.068 | 0.046 | 0.016 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.601 | 0.764 | 0.855 | 0.923 | 0.969 | 0.985 | 0.991 | 0.996 | 0.999 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC1:
p=.03
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC2:
p=.047
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.0063
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.03
Features: DT_IgG1, FHA_IgG1, PT_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.647 | 0.907 | 0.845 | 0.640 | 0.583 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.543 | 0.164 | 0.143 | 0.082 | 0.068 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.543 | 0.707 | 0.850 | 0.932 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG1 PC1:
p=.83
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG1 PC2:
p=.0012
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.32
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.36
Features: DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, PT_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.853 | 0.742 | 0.657 | 0.627 | 0.438 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.686 | 0.110 | 0.086 | 0.079 | 0.038 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.686 | 0.797 | 0.883 | 0.962 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG3 PC1:
p=.043
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG3 PC2: p=.17
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.46
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.11
Features: DT_IgG, PT_IgG, FHA_IgG, PRN_IgG, TT_IgG
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.640 | 0.962 | 0.797 | 0.660 | 0.559 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.538 | 0.185 | 0.127 | 0.087 | 0.063 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.538 | 0.723 | 0.850 | 0.937 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG PC1:
p=.0077
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG PC2:
p=.00011
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.74
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_IgG, DT_IgG1, FHA_ADCD, FHA_ADNP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, FHA_IgG1, PRN_ADCD, PRN_ADNP, TT_ADCD
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | PC11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.235 | 1.383 | 1.236 | 0.892 | 0.711 | 0.637 | 0.584 | 0.437 | 0.396 | 0.327 | 0.244 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.454 | 0.174 | 0.139 | 0.072 | 0.046 | 0.037 | 0.031 | 0.017 | 0.014 | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.454 | 0.628 | 0.767 | 0.839 | 0.885 | 0.922 | 0.953 | 0.971 | 0.985 | 0.995 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 1 PC1: p=.13
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 1 PC2: p=.38
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.14
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.76
Features: PT_ADCD, PT_ADCP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG, PT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.214 | 0.733 | 0.530 | 0.380 | 0.339 | 0.144 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.817 | 0.090 | 0.047 | 0.024 | 0.019 | 0.003 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.817 | 0.907 | 0.953 | 0.977 | 0.997 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 2 PC1: p=.14
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 2 PC2: p<.0001
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.0079
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.061
Features: DT_ADCP, DT_IgG2, FHA_ADCP, FHA_IgG, FHA_IgG2, TT_IgG2
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.45 | 1.242 | 0.975 | 0.809 | 0.669 | 0.553 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.35 | 0.257 | 0.158 | 0.109 | 0.075 | 0.051 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.35 | 0.607 | 0.766 | 0.875 | 0.949 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 3 PC1: p=.00014
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 3 PC2: p=.68
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.00013
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.023
Features: PRN_ADCP, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PRN_IgG, PRN_IgG1, PRN_IgG2
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.066 | 0.861 | 0.758 | 0.466 | 0.383 | 0.232 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.711 | 0.124 | 0.096 | 0.036 | 0.024 | 0.009 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.711 | 0.835 | 0.930 | 0.967 | 0.991 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 4 PC1: p=.48
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 4 PC2: p=.97
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.79
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.25
Features: DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, PT_ADNP, PT_IgG3, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP, TT_FcgR2a, TT_FcgR3b, TT_IgG, TT_IgG1, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | PC11 | PC12 | PC13 | PC14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.881 | 1.193 | 1.018 | 0.789 | 0.743 | 0.650 | 0.627 | 0.554 | 0.520 | 0.475 | 0.418 | 0.360 | 0.312 | 0.214 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.593 | 0.102 | 0.074 | 0.044 | 0.039 | 0.030 | 0.028 | 0.022 | 0.019 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.009 | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.593 | 0.695 | 0.769 | 0.813 | 0.852 | 0.883 | 0.911 | 0.933 | 0.952 | 0.968 | 0.981 | 0.990 | 0.997 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 5 PC1: p=.0083
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 5 PC2: p=.4
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.043
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.085
Features: DT_ADNP, PT_IgG2
| PC1 | PC2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.098 | 0.891 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.603 | 0.397 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.603 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 6 PC1: p=.66
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 6 PC2: p=.29
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.95
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.19
Features: DT_IgG4, FHA_IgG4, PRN_IgG4, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.637 | 0.969 | 0.811 | 0.710 | 0.467 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.536 | 0.188 | 0.131 | 0.101 | 0.044 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.536 | 0.724 | 0.855 | 0.956 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 7 PC1: p=.2
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 7 PC2: p=.017
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.092
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.21
Features: PT_ADCD, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG, PT_IgG1, PT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.031 | 1.196 | 0.951 | 0.940 | 0.878 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.412 | 0.143 | 0.091 | 0.088 | 0.077 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.412 | 0.555 | 0.646 | 0.734 | 0.811 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PT PC1: p=.11
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PT PC2: p=.015
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PT UMAP1: p=.59
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PT UMAP2: p=.012
Features: FHA_ADCD, FHA_ADCP, FHA_ADNP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, FHA_IgG, FHA_IgG1, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG3, FHA_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.239 | 1.085 | 1.023 | 0.917 | 0.746 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.501 | 0.118 | 0.105 | 0.084 | 0.056 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.501 | 0.619 | 0.724 | 0.808 | 0.864 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted FHA PC1: p=.027
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted FHA PC2: p=.99
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted FHA UMAP1: p=.02
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted FHA UMAP2: p=.24
Features: PRN_ADCD, PRN_ADNP, PRN_ADCP, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PRN_IgG, PRN_IgG1, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG3, PRN_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.216 | 1.112 | 0.985 | 0.912 | 0.869 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.491 | 0.124 | 0.097 | 0.083 | 0.076 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.491 | 0.615 | 0.712 | 0.795 | 0.871 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PRN PC1: p=.63
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PRN PC2: p=.39
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PRN UMAP1: p=.38
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PRN UMAP2: p=.88
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_FcgR2a, DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG, DT_IgG1, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, DT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.763 | 1.235 | 1.110 | 1.068 | 0.959 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.311 | 0.153 | 0.123 | 0.114 | 0.092 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.311 | 0.463 | 0.587 | 0.701 | 0.793 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted DT PC1: p=.28
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted DT PC2: p=.83
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted DT UMAP1: p=.17
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted DT UMAP2: p=.39
Features: TT_ADCD, TT_FcgR2a, TT_ADNP, TT_IgG4, TT_ADCP, TT_FcgR3b, TT_IgG, TT_IgG1, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.636 | 1.244 | 1.160 | 1.047 | 0.996 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.268 | 0.155 | 0.134 | 0.110 | 0.099 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.268 | 0.422 | 0.557 | 0.666 | 0.766 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT PC1: p=.66
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT PC2: p=.53
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.58
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.67
Features: PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG4, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, TT_IgG2
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.851 | 1.158 | 1.115 | 1.050 | 0.905 | 0.895 | 0.654 | 0.560 | 0.526 | 0.501 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.342 | 0.134 | 0.124 | 0.110 | 0.082 | 0.080 | 0.043 | 0.031 | 0.028 | 0.025 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.342 | 0.477 | 0.601 | 0.711 | 0.793 | 0.873 | 0.916 | 0.947 | 0.975 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC1:
p=.71
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC2:
p=.03
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.45
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.31
Features: DT_ADCD, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, PT_ADCD, TT_ADCD
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.874 | 0.807 | 0.616 | 0.604 | 0.303 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.703 | 0.130 | 0.076 | 0.073 | 0.018 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.703 | 0.833 | 0.909 | 0.982 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster ADCD PC1: p=.27
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster ADCD PC2: p=.37
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.43
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.16
Features: DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, PRN_ADNP, TT_ADNP, FHA_ADCP, FHA_ADNP, TT_ADCP, PRN_ADCP, PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.772 | 1.278 | 1.079 | 1.002 | 0.920 | 0.859 | 0.771 | 0.700 | 0.471 | 0.414 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.314 | 0.163 | 0.116 | 0.100 | 0.085 | 0.074 | 0.059 | 0.049 | 0.022 | 0.017 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.314 | 0.477 | 0.594 | 0.694 | 0.779 | 0.852 | 0.912 | 0.961 | 0.983 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC1:
p=.84
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC2:
p=.63
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.77
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.21
Features: DT_FcgR2a, TT_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, DT_FcgR3b, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR3b, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.976 | 1.414 | 1.239 | 0.999 | 0.854 | 0.756 | 0.369 | 0.269 | 0.181 | 0.146 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.390 | 0.200 | 0.153 | 0.100 | 0.073 | 0.057 | 0.014 | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.390 | 0.590 | 0.744 | 0.844 | 0.917 | 0.974 | 0.987 | 0.995 | 0.998 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC1:
p=.58
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC2:
p=.28
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.022
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.16
Features: FHA_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, PT_IgG1, DT_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.683 | 0.866 | 0.747 | 0.715 | 0.591 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.566 | 0.150 | 0.112 | 0.102 | 0.070 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.566 | 0.716 | 0.828 | 0.930 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG1 PC1: p=.079
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG1 PC2: p=.0049
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.38
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.12
Features: PRN_IgG3, DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PT_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.617 | 0.859 | 0.787 | 0.749 | 0.684 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.523 | 0.148 | 0.124 | 0.112 | 0.094 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.523 | 0.670 | 0.794 | 0.906 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG3 PC1: p=.31
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG3 PC2: p=.59
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.64
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.36
Features: FHA_IgG, PRN_IgG, PT_IgG, DT_IgG, TT_IgG
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.825 | 0.798 | 0.644 | 0.593 | 0.515 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.666 | 0.127 | 0.083 | 0.070 | 0.053 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.666 | 0.794 | 0.877 | 0.947 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG PC1: p=.28
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG PC2: p=.075
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.71
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.38
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_FcgR2a, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, PT_ADCD, TT_ADCD, TT_FcgR2a
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.002 | 1.084 | 0.812 | 0.666 | 0.601 | 0.518 | 0.290 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.573 | 0.168 | 0.094 | 0.063 | 0.052 | 0.038 | 0.012 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.573 | 0.741 | 0.835 | 0.898 | 0.950 | 0.988 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 1 PC1: p=.29
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 1 PC2: p=.74
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.31
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.12
Features: DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, PRN_ADNP, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, TT_ADNP, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.483 | 1.162 | 0.979 | 0.899 | 0.837 | 0.778 | 0.615 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.314 | 0.193 | 0.137 | 0.115 | 0.100 | 0.087 | 0.054 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.314 | 0.507 | 0.644 | 0.759 | 0.859 | 0.946 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 2 PC1: p=.31
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 2 PC2: p=.12
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.27
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.64
Features: FHA_ADCP, FHA_ADNP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, FHA_IgG, FHA_IgG1, TT_ADCP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.040 | 1.003 | 0.796 | 0.729 | 0.594 | 0.521 | 0.214 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.594 | 0.144 | 0.090 | 0.076 | 0.050 | 0.039 | 0.007 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.594 | 0.738 | 0.828 | 0.904 | 0.955 | 0.993 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 3 PC1: p=.052
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 3 PC2: p=.18
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.055
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.0066
Features: DT_FcgR3b, PRN_ADCP, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PRN_IgG, PRN_IgG1, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.036 | 1.068 | 0.797 | 0.704 | 0.590 | 0.451 | 0.175 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.592 | 0.163 | 0.091 | 0.071 | 0.050 | 0.029 | 0.004 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.592 | 0.755 | 0.846 | 0.917 | 0.966 | 0.996 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 4 PC1: p=.36
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 4 PC2: p=.37
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.54
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.54
Features: PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG, PT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.920 | 0.931 | 0.714 | 0.705 | 0.543 | 0.378 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.615 | 0.144 | 0.085 | 0.083 | 0.049 | 0.024 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.615 | 0.759 | 0.844 | 0.927 | 0.976 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 5 PC1: p=.085
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 5 PC2: p=.39
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.0043
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.0092
Features: DT_IgG, DT_IgG1, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG3, PRN_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.690 | 1.166 | 0.943 | 0.821 | 0.767 | 0.620 | 0.499 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.408 | 0.194 | 0.127 | 0.096 | 0.084 | 0.055 | 0.036 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.408 | 0.602 | 0.729 | 0.825 | 0.910 | 0.964 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 6 PC1: p=.51
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 6 PC2: p=.16
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.59
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.57
Features: DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG3, FHA_IgG4, PT_IgG3, TT_IgG, TT_IgG1, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.805 | 1.170 | 1.123 | 0.897 | 0.837 | 0.765 | 0.674 | 0.558 | 0.508 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.362 | 0.152 | 0.140 | 0.089 | 0.078 | 0.065 | 0.050 | 0.035 | 0.029 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.362 | 0.514 | 0.654 | 0.743 | 0.821 | 0.886 | 0.937 | 0.971 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 7 PC1: p=.32
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 7 PC2: p=.2
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.36
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.59
sessionInfo()
R version 4.4.2 (2024-10-31)
Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20
Running under: macOS Sequoia 15.1.1
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib; LAPACK version 3.12.0
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
time zone: America/New_York
tzcode source: internal
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] e1071_1.7-16 glue_1.8.0 RPostgres_1.4.7
[4] magrittr_2.0.3 broom.helpers_1.17.0 broom_1.0.7
[7] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 skimr_2.1.5 rmarkdown_2.28
[10] papeR_1.0-5 xtable_1.8-4 car_3.1-3
[13] carData_3.0-5 corrplot_0.94 rempsyc_0.1.8
[16] FactoMineR_2.11 factoextra_1.0.7 rstatix_0.7.2
[19] umap_0.2.10.0 pracma_2.4.4 PCAmixdata_3.1
[22] qgraph_1.9.8 kableExtra_1.4.0 gtsummary_2.0.3
[25] gtExtras_0.5.0 gt_0.11.1 ggfortify_0.4.17
[28] ggpubr_0.6.0 ggExtra_0.10.1 ggrepel_0.9.6
[31] janitor_2.2.0 here_1.0.1 data.table_1.16.2
[34] DT_0.33 DBI_1.2.3 fpc_2.2-13
[37] lubridate_1.9.3 forcats_1.0.0 stringr_1.5.1
[40] dplyr_1.1.4 purrr_1.0.2 readr_2.1.5
[43] tidyr_1.3.1 tibble_3.2.1 ggplot2_3.5.1
[46] tidyverse_2.0.0
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] splines_4.4.2 later_1.3.2 rpart_4.1.23
[4] lifecycle_1.0.4 rprojroot_2.0.4 lattice_0.22-6
[7] prabclus_2.3-4 MASS_7.3-61 flashClust_1.01-2
[10] backports_1.5.0 Hmisc_5.1-3 sass_0.4.9
[13] jquerylib_0.1.4 yaml_2.3.10 httpuv_1.6.15
[16] flexmix_2.3-19 askpass_1.2.1 reticulate_1.39.0
[19] pbapply_1.7-2 multcomp_1.4-26 abind_1.4-8
[22] quadprog_1.5-8 TH.data_1.1-2 nnet_7.3-19
[25] sandwich_3.1-1 git2r_0.33.0 gmodels_2.19.1
[28] gdata_3.0.0 RSpectra_0.16-2 svglite_2.1.3
[31] codetools_0.2-20 xml2_1.3.6 tidyselect_1.2.1
[34] farver_2.1.2 stats4_4.4.2 base64enc_0.1-3
[37] jsonlite_1.8.9 Formula_1.2-5 survival_3.7-0
[40] emmeans_1.10.4 systemfonts_1.1.0 tools_4.4.2
[43] Rcpp_1.0.13 mnormt_2.1.1 gridExtra_2.3
[46] xfun_0.48 withr_3.0.1 fastmap_1.2.0
[49] fansi_1.0.6 openssl_2.2.2 digest_0.6.37
[52] timechange_0.3.0 R6_2.5.1 mime_0.12
[55] estimability_1.5.1 colorspace_2.1-1 gtools_3.9.5
[58] jpeg_0.1-10 diptest_0.77-1 utf8_1.2.4
[61] generics_0.1.3 corpcor_1.6.10 robustbase_0.99-4-1
[64] class_7.3-22 htmlwidgets_1.6.4 scatterplot3d_0.3-44
[67] whisker_0.4.1 pkgconfig_2.0.3 gtable_0.3.5
[70] modeltools_0.2-23 blob_1.2.4 workflowr_1.7.1
[73] htmltools_0.5.8.1 lavaan_0.6-19 multcompView_0.1-10
[76] scales_1.3.0 leaps_3.2 png_0.1-8
[79] snakecase_0.11.1 knitr_1.48.1 rstudioapi_0.16.0
[82] tzdb_0.4.0 reshape2_1.4.4 coda_0.19-4.1
[85] checkmate_2.3.2 nlme_3.1-166 proxy_0.4-27
[88] repr_1.1.7 zoo_1.8-12 cachem_1.1.0
[91] parallel_4.4.2 miniUI_0.1.1.1 foreign_0.8-87
[94] pillar_1.9.0 grid_4.4.2 vctrs_0.6.5
[97] promises_1.3.0 cluster_2.1.6 htmlTable_2.4.3
[100] paletteer_1.6.0 evaluate_1.0.1 pbivnorm_0.6.0
[103] mvtnorm_1.3-1 cli_3.6.3 compiler_4.4.2
[106] rlang_1.1.4 ggsignif_0.6.4 labeling_0.4.3
[109] fdrtool_1.2.18 mclust_6.1.1 rematch2_2.1.2
[112] plyr_1.8.9 fs_1.6.4 stringi_1.8.4
[115] psych_2.4.6.26 viridisLite_0.4.2 munsell_0.5.1
[118] Matrix_1.7-1 hms_1.1.3 glasso_1.11
[121] bit64_4.5.2 shiny_1.9.1 highr_0.11
[124] kernlab_0.9-33 fontawesome_0.5.2 igraph_2.0.3
[127] bslib_0.8.0 bit_4.5.0 DEoptimR_1.1-3