Last updated: 2024-11-25
Checks: 7 0
Knit directory:
madi-biostat-project3-SDY8003-Thailand/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.1). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
The command set.seed(20231106) was run prior to running
the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results
that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are
reproducible.
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.
Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version 4461231. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for
the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results
(you can use wflow_publish or
wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown
file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it
depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results
were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .DS_Store
Ignored: .RData
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: analysis/.DS_Store
Ignored: data/.DS_Store
Ignored: figure/
Unstaged changes:
Modified: code/pca_scores_sigg_apwp_noEL7.RData
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were
made to the R Markdown
(analysis/loop_pca_sigg_apwp_noIgG7.Rmd) and HTML
(docs/loop_pca_sigg_apwp_noIgG7.html) files. If you’ve
configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote),
click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they
were in that past version.
| File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rmd | 4461231 | alecbuetow | 2024-11-25 | corrected mislabeled file name |
| Rmd | 5dae9d3 | alecbuetow | 2024-11-25 | added supervised clusters |
| Rmd | c432a7f | Michael S. Zens | 2024-09-16 | added feature_comparisions and fixed the deimension reduction for 6 variations of clustering for each manuscript. |
Features: PT_ADCD, PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG1, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, PT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.983 | 1.287 | 0.921 | 0.806 | 0.756 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.437 | 0.184 | 0.094 | 0.072 | 0.064 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.437 | 0.621 | 0.715 | 0.787 | 0.851 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated PT PC1: p=.14
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated PT PC2: p<.0001
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated PT UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated PT UMAP2: p=.035
Features: FHA_ADCD, FHA_ADCP, FHA_ADNP, FHA_IgG1, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, FHA_IgG3, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.835 | 1.265 | 1.099 | 0.903 | 0.843 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.374 | 0.178 | 0.134 | 0.091 | 0.079 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.374 | 0.552 | 0.686 | 0.777 | 0.856 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated FHA PC1: p=.23
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated FHA PC2: p<.0001
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated FHA UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated FHA UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: PRN_ADCD, PRN_ADNP, PRN_ADCP, PRN_IgG1, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PRN_IgG3, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.599 | 1.292 | 1.059 | 0.984 | 0.903 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.284 | 0.186 | 0.125 | 0.108 | 0.091 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.284 | 0.470 | 0.594 | 0.702 | 0.793 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated PRN PC1: p=.52
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated PRN PC2: p=.00013
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated PRN UMAP1: p=.22
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated PRN UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG1, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, DT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.639 | 1.262 | 1.231 | 0.971 | 0.877 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.298 | 0.177 | 0.168 | 0.105 | 0.086 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.298 | 0.475 | 0.644 | 0.748 | 0.834 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated DT PC1: p=.11
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated DT PC2: p<.0001
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated DT UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated DT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: TT_ADCD, TT_FcgR2a, TT_IgG1, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4, TT_IgG3, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.954 | 1.261 | 0.961 | 0.866 | 0.723 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.424 | 0.177 | 0.103 | 0.083 | 0.058 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.424 | 0.601 | 0.704 | 0.787 | 0.845 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT PC1: p=.02
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT PC2: p<.0001
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.291 | 1.016 | 0.961 | 0.868 | 0.724 | 0.677 | 0.602 | 0.545 | 0.453 | 0.441 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.525 | 0.103 | 0.092 | 0.075 | 0.052 | 0.046 | 0.036 | 0.030 | 0.021 | 0.019 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.525 | 0.628 | 0.721 | 0.796 | 0.848 | 0.894 | 0.930 | 0.960 | 0.981 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC1:
p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC2: p=.063
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.68
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_ADCD, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, TT_ADCD, PT_ADCD
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.858 | 0.810 | 0.738 | 0.471 | 0.356 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.690 | 0.131 | 0.109 | 0.044 | 0.025 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.690 | 0.821 | 0.930 | 0.975 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster ADCD PC1: p=.77
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster ADCD PC2: p=.37
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.27
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.47
Features: DT_ADCP, PRN_ADNP, DT_ADNP, FHA_ADCP, FHA_ADNP, PRN_ADCP, PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.691 | 1.371 | 1.093 | 1.027 | 0.864 | 0.765 | 0.753 | 0.708 | 0.567 | 0.542 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.286 | 0.188 | 0.119 | 0.105 | 0.075 | 0.058 | 0.057 | 0.050 | 0.032 | 0.029 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.286 | 0.474 | 0.593 | 0.699 | 0.773 | 0.832 | 0.888 | 0.938 | 0.971 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC1:
p=.007
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC2: p=.72
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.057
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.0035
Features: DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.483 | 1.134 | 0.865 | 0.786 | 0.680 | 0.580 | 0.406 | 0.306 | 0.268 | 0.229 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.617 | 0.128 | 0.075 | 0.062 | 0.046 | 0.034 | 0.016 | 0.009 | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.617 | 0.745 | 0.820 | 0.882 | 0.928 | 0.962 | 0.978 | 0.988 | 0.995 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC1:
p=.85
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC2:
p=.79
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.79
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.81
Features: PT_IgG1, DT_IgG1, FHA_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.696 | 0.907 | 0.782 | 0.673 | 0.488 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.575 | 0.165 | 0.122 | 0.091 | 0.048 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.575 | 0.740 | 0.862 | 0.952 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG1 PC1: p=.73
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG1 PC2: p=.87
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.27
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.77
Features: DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, PT_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.735 | 0.808 | 0.755 | 0.624 | 0.613 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.602 | 0.131 | 0.114 | 0.078 | 0.075 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.602 | 0.733 | 0.847 | 0.925 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG3 PC1: p=.28
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG3 PC2: p=.28
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.24
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.43
Features:
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_ADCP, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, PRN_ADNP, TT_ADCD
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.764 | 1.016 | 0.972 | 0.730 | 0.505 | 0.354 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.518 | 0.172 | 0.158 | 0.089 | 0.042 | 0.021 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.518 | 0.690 | 0.848 | 0.937 | 0.979 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 1 PC1: p=.98
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 1 PC2: p=.65
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.42
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.82
Features: DT_ADNP, FHA_ADCP, FHA_ADNP, PRN_ADCP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.435 | 0.917 | 0.790 | 0.690 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.514 | 0.210 | 0.156 | 0.119 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.514 | 0.725 | 0.881 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 2 PC1: p=.031
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 2 PC2: p=.6
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.75
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.063
Features: DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, PT_ADCD, PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG1, TT_FcgR2a
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.257 | 1.008 | 0.863 | 0.781 | 0.760 | 0.680 | 0.586 | 0.307 | 0.236 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.566 | 0.113 | 0.083 | 0.068 | 0.064 | 0.051 | 0.038 | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.566 | 0.679 | 0.762 | 0.830 | 0.894 | 0.945 | 0.983 | 0.994 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 3 PC1: p=.63
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 3 PC2: p=.68
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.011
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.77
Features: DT_IgG1, FHA_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.589 | 0.818 | 0.729 | 0.526 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.631 | 0.167 | 0.133 | 0.069 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.631 | 0.798 | 0.931 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 4 PC1: p=.81
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 4 PC2: p=.021
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.74
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.31
Features: DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.291 | 1.016 | 0.961 | 0.868 | 0.724 | 0.677 | 0.602 | 0.545 | 0.453 | 0.441 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.525 | 0.103 | 0.092 | 0.075 | 0.052 | 0.046 | 0.036 | 0.030 | 0.021 | 0.019 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.525 | 0.628 | 0.721 | 0.796 | 0.848 | 0.894 | 0.930 | 0.960 | 0.981 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 5 PC1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 5 PC2: p=.063
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.68
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, PT_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.735 | 0.808 | 0.755 | 0.624 | 0.613 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.602 | 0.131 | 0.114 | 0.078 | 0.075 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.602 | 0.733 | 0.847 | 0.925 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 6 PC1: p=.28
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 6 PC2: p=.28
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.24
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.43
Features: FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.055 | 1.004 | 0.841 | 0.657 | 0.562 | 0.459 | 0.324 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.603 | 0.144 | 0.101 | 0.062 | 0.045 | 0.030 | 0.015 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.603 | 0.747 | 0.848 | 0.910 | 0.955 | 0.985 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 7 PC1: p=.31
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated RCluster_ 7 PC2: p=.0031
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP1: p=.0083
Infant AP vs. WP vaccinated TT UMAP2: p=.22
Features: PT_ADCD, PT_IgG1, PT_ADNP, PT_IgG3, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, PT_ADCP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.797 | 1.353 | 1.038 | 0.919 | 0.827 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.359 | 0.203 | 0.120 | 0.094 | 0.076 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.359 | 0.562 | 0.682 | 0.776 | 0.852 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted PT PC1: p=.00053
Infant AP vs. WP boosted PT PC2: p<.0001
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted PT UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP boosted PT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: FHA_ADCD, FHA_IgG1, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, FHA_IgG3, FHA_ADCP, FHA_ADNP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.876 | 1.182 | 1.085 | 0.912 | 0.849 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.391 | 0.155 | 0.131 | 0.092 | 0.080 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.391 | 0.546 | 0.677 | 0.770 | 0.850 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted FHA PC1: p=.00042
Infant AP vs. WP boosted FHA PC2: p=.00064
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted FHA UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP boosted FHA UMAP2: p=.33
Features: PRN_ADCD, PRN_IgG1, PRN_ADNP, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PRN_IgG3, PRN_ADCP, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.562 | 1.384 | 1.100 | 1.014 | 0.943 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.271 | 0.213 | 0.134 | 0.114 | 0.099 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.271 | 0.484 | 0.619 | 0.733 | 0.832 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted PRN PC1: p=.68
Infant AP vs. WP boosted PRN PC2: p<.0001
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted PRN UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP boosted PRN UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, DT_IgG1, DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG4, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.436 | 1.259 | 1.162 | 1.123 | 1.041 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.229 | 0.176 | 0.150 | 0.140 | 0.120 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.229 | 0.405 | 0.555 | 0.695 | 0.816 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted DT PC1: p=.66
Infant AP vs. WP boosted DT PC2: p=.0002
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted DT UMAP1: p=.15
Infant AP vs. WP boosted DT UMAP2: p=.00077
Features: TT_ADCD, TT_FcgR2a, TT_IgG1, TT_ADNP, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4, TT_IgG3, TT_ADCP, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.706 | 1.175 | 1.130 | 0.946 | 0.926 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.323 | 0.153 | 0.142 | 0.099 | 0.095 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.323 | 0.477 | 0.619 | 0.718 | 0.813 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT PC1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT PC2: p=.029
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.0003
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_IgG4, DT_IgG2, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.350 | 0.979 | 0.967 | 0.847 | 0.781 | 0.715 | 0.558 | 0.405 | 0.395 | 0.336 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.552 | 0.096 | 0.093 | 0.072 | 0.061 | 0.051 | 0.031 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.011 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.552 | 0.648 | 0.742 | 0.813 | 0.874 | 0.926 | 0.957 | 0.973 | 0.989 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC1:
p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC2: p=.53
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_ADCD, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, PT_ADCD, TT_ADCD
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.899 | 0.728 | 0.602 | 0.558 | 0.433 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.722 | 0.106 | 0.073 | 0.062 | 0.038 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.722 | 0.828 | 0.900 | 0.962 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster ADCD PC1: p=.99
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster ADCD PC2: p=.0018
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.54
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.7
Features: DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, PRN_ADNP, PT_ADNP, TT_ADNP, FHA_ADCP, PRN_ADCP, TT_ADCP, FHA_ADNP, PT_ADCP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.717 | 1.404 | 1.195 | 0.963 | 0.851 | 0.780 | 0.705 | 0.625 | 0.544 | 0.458 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.295 | 0.197 | 0.143 | 0.093 | 0.072 | 0.061 | 0.050 | 0.039 | 0.030 | 0.021 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.295 | 0.492 | 0.635 | 0.728 | 0.800 | 0.861 | 0.910 | 0.949 | 0.979 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC1: p=.14
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC2: p=.099
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.39
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.91
Features: TT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.136 | 1.283 | 1.087 | 0.966 | 0.843 | 0.716 | 0.436 | 0.373 | 0.290 | 0.197 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.456 | 0.165 | 0.118 | 0.093 | 0.071 | 0.051 | 0.019 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.456 | 0.621 | 0.739 | 0.832 | 0.904 | 0.955 | 0.974 | 0.988 | 0.996 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC1:
p=.41
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC2:
p=.0046
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.12
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.096
Features: DT_IgG1, FHA_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, PT_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.669 | 0.862 | 0.747 | 0.705 | 0.646 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.557 | 0.149 | 0.112 | 0.099 | 0.084 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.557 | 0.706 | 0.817 | 0.916 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster IgG1 PC1: p=.71
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster IgG1 PC2: p=.61
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.86
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.36
Features: PT_IgG3, DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.533 | 0.945 | 0.814 | 0.764 | 0.714 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.470 | 0.178 | 0.133 | 0.117 | 0.102 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.470 | 0.649 | 0.781 | 0.898 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster IgG3 PC1: p=.21
Infant AP vs. WP boosted Feature Cluster IgG3 PC2: p=1
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.13
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.25
Features:
Features: DT_ADCD, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, PT_ADCD, TT_ADCD, TT_FcgR2a
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.973 | 0.879 | 0.720 | 0.598 | 0.539 | 0.410 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.649 | 0.129 | 0.086 | 0.060 | 0.048 | 0.028 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.649 | 0.778 | 0.864 | 0.924 | 0.972 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 1 PC1: p=.84
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 1 PC2: p=.26
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.96
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.63
Features: DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, DT_IgG1, FHA_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, PT_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.702 | 1.152 | 0.884 | 0.785 | 0.730 | 0.677 | 0.624 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.414 | 0.189 | 0.112 | 0.088 | 0.076 | 0.065 | 0.056 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.414 | 0.603 | 0.715 | 0.803 | 0.879 | 0.944 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 2 PC1: p=.52
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 2 PC2: p=.11
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.74
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.92
Features: DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG4, PRN_ADNP, PT_ADNP, PT_IgG3, TT_ADNP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.482 | 1.233 | 1.102 | 0.908 | 0.723 | 0.689 | 0.495 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.314 | 0.217 | 0.173 | 0.118 | 0.075 | 0.068 | 0.035 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.314 | 0.531 | 0.705 | 0.822 | 0.897 | 0.965 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 3 PC1: p=.22
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 3 PC2: p=.095
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.053
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.014
Features: DT_IgG2, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.307 | 0.968 | 0.849 | 0.781 | 0.719 | 0.643 | 0.435 | 0.400 | 0.363 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.591 | 0.104 | 0.080 | 0.068 | 0.057 | 0.046 | 0.021 | 0.018 | 0.015 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.591 | 0.695 | 0.775 | 0.843 | 0.901 | 0.947 | 0.968 | 0.985 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 4 PC1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 4 PC2: p=.83
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p<.0001
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p<.0001
Features: DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.487 | 0.820 | 0.766 | 0.729 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.553 | 0.168 | 0.147 | 0.133 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.553 | 0.721 | 0.867 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 5 PC1: p=.21
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 5 PC2: p=.076
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.16
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.83
Features: FHA_ADCP, PRN_ADCP, TT_ADCP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.405 | 0.765 | 0.663 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.658 | 0.195 | 0.147 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.658 | 0.853 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 6 PC1: p=.059
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 6 PC2: p=.79
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.075
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.63
Features: FHA_ADNP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PT_ADCP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.159 | 1.202 | 0.974 | 0.840 | 0.808 | 0.526 | 0.431 | 0.281 | 0.209 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.518 | 0.160 | 0.105 | 0.078 | 0.073 | 0.031 | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.518 | 0.679 | 0.784 | 0.862 | 0.935 | 0.966 | 0.986 | 0.995 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 7 PC1: p=.58
Infant AP vs. WP boosted RCluster_ 7 PC2: p=.00014
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP1: p=.059
Infant AP vs. WP boosted TT UMAP2: p=.12
sessionInfo()
R version 4.4.2 (2024-10-31)
Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20
Running under: macOS Sequoia 15.1.1
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib; LAPACK version 3.12.0
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
time zone: America/New_York
tzcode source: internal
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] e1071_1.7-16 glue_1.8.0 RPostgres_1.4.7
[4] magrittr_2.0.3 broom.helpers_1.17.0 broom_1.0.7
[7] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 skimr_2.1.5 rmarkdown_2.28
[10] papeR_1.0-5 xtable_1.8-4 car_3.1-3
[13] carData_3.0-5 corrplot_0.94 rempsyc_0.1.8
[16] FactoMineR_2.11 factoextra_1.0.7 rstatix_0.7.2
[19] umap_0.2.10.0 pracma_2.4.4 PCAmixdata_3.1
[22] qgraph_1.9.8 kableExtra_1.4.0 gtsummary_2.0.3
[25] gtExtras_0.5.0 gt_0.11.1 ggfortify_0.4.17
[28] ggpubr_0.6.0 ggExtra_0.10.1 ggrepel_0.9.6
[31] janitor_2.2.0 here_1.0.1 data.table_1.16.2
[34] DT_0.33 DBI_1.2.3 fpc_2.2-13
[37] lubridate_1.9.3 forcats_1.0.0 stringr_1.5.1
[40] dplyr_1.1.4 purrr_1.0.2 readr_2.1.5
[43] tidyr_1.3.1 tibble_3.2.1 ggplot2_3.5.1
[46] tidyverse_2.0.0
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] splines_4.4.2 later_1.3.2 rpart_4.1.23
[4] lifecycle_1.0.4 rprojroot_2.0.4 lattice_0.22-6
[7] prabclus_2.3-4 MASS_7.3-61 flashClust_1.01-2
[10] backports_1.5.0 Hmisc_5.1-3 sass_0.4.9
[13] jquerylib_0.1.4 yaml_2.3.10 httpuv_1.6.15
[16] flexmix_2.3-19 askpass_1.2.1 reticulate_1.39.0
[19] pbapply_1.7-2 multcomp_1.4-26 abind_1.4-8
[22] quadprog_1.5-8 TH.data_1.1-2 nnet_7.3-19
[25] sandwich_3.1-1 git2r_0.33.0 gmodels_2.19.1
[28] gdata_3.0.0 RSpectra_0.16-2 svglite_2.1.3
[31] codetools_0.2-20 xml2_1.3.6 tidyselect_1.2.1
[34] farver_2.1.2 stats4_4.4.2 base64enc_0.1-3
[37] jsonlite_1.8.9 Formula_1.2-5 survival_3.7-0
[40] emmeans_1.10.4 systemfonts_1.1.0 tools_4.4.2
[43] Rcpp_1.0.13 mnormt_2.1.1 gridExtra_2.3
[46] xfun_0.48 withr_3.0.1 fastmap_1.2.0
[49] fansi_1.0.6 openssl_2.2.2 digest_0.6.37
[52] timechange_0.3.0 R6_2.5.1 mime_0.12
[55] estimability_1.5.1 colorspace_2.1-1 gtools_3.9.5
[58] jpeg_0.1-10 diptest_0.77-1 utf8_1.2.4
[61] generics_0.1.3 corpcor_1.6.10 robustbase_0.99-4-1
[64] class_7.3-22 htmlwidgets_1.6.4 scatterplot3d_0.3-44
[67] whisker_0.4.1 pkgconfig_2.0.3 gtable_0.3.5
[70] modeltools_0.2-23 blob_1.2.4 workflowr_1.7.1
[73] htmltools_0.5.8.1 lavaan_0.6-19 multcompView_0.1-10
[76] scales_1.3.0 leaps_3.2 png_0.1-8
[79] snakecase_0.11.1 knitr_1.48.1 rstudioapi_0.16.0
[82] tzdb_0.4.0 reshape2_1.4.4 coda_0.19-4.1
[85] checkmate_2.3.2 nlme_3.1-166 proxy_0.4-27
[88] repr_1.1.7 zoo_1.8-12 cachem_1.1.0
[91] parallel_4.4.2 miniUI_0.1.1.1 foreign_0.8-87
[94] pillar_1.9.0 grid_4.4.2 vctrs_0.6.5
[97] promises_1.3.0 cluster_2.1.6 htmlTable_2.4.3
[100] paletteer_1.6.0 evaluate_1.0.1 pbivnorm_0.6.0
[103] mvtnorm_1.3-1 cli_3.6.3 compiler_4.4.2
[106] rlang_1.1.4 ggsignif_0.6.4 labeling_0.4.3
[109] fdrtool_1.2.18 mclust_6.1.1 rematch2_2.1.2
[112] plyr_1.8.9 fs_1.6.4 stringi_1.8.4
[115] psych_2.4.6.26 viridisLite_0.4.2 munsell_0.5.1
[118] Matrix_1.7-1 hms_1.1.3 glasso_1.11
[121] bit64_4.5.2 shiny_1.9.1 highr_0.11
[124] kernlab_0.9-33 fontawesome_0.5.2 igraph_2.0.3
[127] bslib_0.8.0 bit_4.5.0 DEoptimR_1.1-3