Last updated: 2024-12-02
Checks: 7 0
Knit directory:
madi-biostat-project3-SDY8003-Thailand/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.1). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
The command set.seed(20231106) was run prior to running
the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results
that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are
reproducible.
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.
Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version 03a267b. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for
the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results
(you can use wflow_publish or
wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown
file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it
depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results
were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .DS_Store
Ignored: .RData
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: analysis/.DS_Store
Ignored: data/.DS_Store
Ignored: figure/
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were
made to the R Markdown
(analysis/loop_pca_sigg_matpm_noEL7.Rmd) and HTML
(docs/loop_pca_sigg_matpm_noEL7.html) files. If you’ve
configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote),
click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they
were in that past version.
| File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rmd | 03a267b | alecbuetow | 2024-12-02 | updated loops with feature clusters |
| Rmd | c432a7f | Michael S. Zens | 2024-09-16 | added feature_comparisions and fixed the deimension reduction for 6 variations of clustering for each manuscript. |
| html | 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 | dimensionality reduction executed, pngs and html updated |
| Rmd | 5261902 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-14 | UMAP added to dimensionality reduction for matpm analyses |
| html | 358003a | Michael S. Zens | 2024-06-18 | more supporting files for the Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- |
| Rmd | ffc6428 | Michael S. Zens | 2024-06-18 | big set of maternal Tdap+ vs Tdap- results |
Features: PT_ADCD, PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG1, PT_IgG3, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, PT_IgG
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.158 | 1.119 | 1.000 | 0.922 | 0.862 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.466 | 0.125 | 0.100 | 0.085 | 0.074 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.466 | 0.591 | 0.691 | 0.776 | 0.850 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PT PC1: p=.00018
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PT PC2: p=.82
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: FHA_ADCD, FHA_ADNP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, FHA_IgG1, FHA_IgG3, FHA_ADCP, FHA_IgG, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.936 | 1.240 | 1.072 | 1.007 | 0.840 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.375 | 0.154 | 0.115 | 0.101 | 0.070 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.375 | 0.529 | 0.644 | 0.745 | 0.815 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated FHA PC1: p=.00059
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated FHA PC2: p=.002
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: PRN_ADCD, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PRN_IgG1, PRN_IgG3, PRN_ADCP, PRN_IgG, PRN_IgG4, PRN_ADNP, PRN_IgG2
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.709 | 1.193 | 1.052 | 1.005 | 0.974 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.292 | 0.142 | 0.111 | 0.101 | 0.095 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.292 | 0.434 | 0.545 | 0.646 | 0.741 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PRN PC1: p<.0001
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated PRN PC2: p=.082
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG1, DT_IgG3, DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, DT_IgG, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.677 | 1.283 | 1.180 | 1.093 | 0.889 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.281 | 0.165 | 0.139 | 0.120 | 0.079 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.281 | 0.446 | 0.585 | 0.705 | 0.784 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated DT PC1: p<.0001
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated DT PC2: p=.064
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: TT_ADCD, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP, TT_FcgR2a, TT_FcgR3b, TT_IgG1, TT_IgG3, TT_IgG, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.978 | 1.214 | 1.017 | 0.972 | 0.872 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.391 | 0.147 | 0.103 | 0.095 | 0.076 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.391 | 0.539 | 0.642 | 0.737 | 0.813 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT PC1: p<.0001
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated TT PC2: p=.77
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: PT_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4, PRN_IgG2
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.811 | 1.254 | 1.105 | 1.003 | 0.931 | 0.765 | 0.739 | 0.653 | 0.527 | 0.466 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.328 | 0.157 | 0.122 | 0.101 | 0.087 | 0.059 | 0.055 | 0.043 | 0.028 | 0.022 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.328 | 0.485 | 0.607 | 0.708 | 0.795 | 0.853 | 0.908 | 0.950 | 0.978 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC1:
p=.41
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC2:
p=.12
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_ADCD, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, PT_ADCD, TT_ADCD
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.966 | 0.772 | 0.566 | 0.350 | 0.313 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.773 | 0.119 | 0.064 | 0.024 | 0.020 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.773 | 0.892 | 0.956 | 0.980 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster ADCD PC1:
p=.0038
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster ADCD PC2: p=.032
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: FHA_ADNP, PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP, DT_ADCP, FHA_ADCP, PRN_ADCP, DT_ADNP, PRN_ADNP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.649 | 1.234 | 1.123 | 1.015 | 0.990 | 0.853 | 0.754 | 0.737 | 0.635 | 0.494 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.272 | 0.152 | 0.126 | 0.103 | 0.098 | 0.073 | 0.057 | 0.054 | 0.040 | 0.024 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.272 | 0.424 | 0.550 | 0.653 | 0.751 | 0.824 | 0.881 | 0.935 | 0.976 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC1:
p=.00032
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC2:
p=.051
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR2a, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.764 | 0.774 | 0.724 | 0.646 | 0.543 | 0.501 | 0.335 | 0.277 | 0.214 | 0.191 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.764 | 0.060 | 0.052 | 0.042 | 0.029 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.764 | 0.824 | 0.877 | 0.918 | 0.948 | 0.973 | 0.984 | 0.992 | 0.996 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC1:
p<.0001
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC2:
p=.8
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_IgG1, FHA_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, PT_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.781 | 0.895 | 0.655 | 0.571 | 0.521 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.634 | 0.160 | 0.086 | 0.065 | 0.054 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.634 | 0.795 | 0.880 | 0.946 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG1 PC1:
p=.014
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG1 PC2: p=.23
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, PT_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.823 | 0.767 | 0.669 | 0.595 | 0.536 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.665 | 0.118 | 0.089 | 0.071 | 0.057 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.665 | 0.782 | 0.872 | 0.943 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG3 PC1:
p=.00052
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG3 PC2: p=.66
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_IgG, FHA_IgG, PRN_IgG, TT_IgG, PT_IgG
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.640 | 0.962 | 0.797 | 0.660 | 0.559 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.538 | 0.185 | 0.127 | 0.087 | 0.063 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.538 | 0.723 | 0.850 | 0.937 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG PC1:
p=.0077
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated Feature Cluster IgG PC2:
p=.00011
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG1, DT_IgG3, FHA_ADCD, FHA_ADNP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, FHA_IgG1, FHA_IgG3, PRN_ADCD, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PRN_IgG1, PRN_IgG3, PT_ADCD, PT_ADCP, PT_ADNP, PT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG1, PT_IgG3, TT_ADCD, TT_ADCP, TT_ADNP, TT_FcgR2a, TT_FcgR3b, TT_IgG1, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | PC11 | PC12 | PC13 | PC14 | PC15 | PC16 | PC17 | PC18 | PC19 | PC20 | PC21 | PC22 | PC23 | PC24 | PC25 | PC26 | PC27 | PC28 | PC29 | PC30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 3.843 | 1.533 | 1.391 | 1.378 | 1.111 | 1.025 | 0.962 | 0.847 | 0.808 | 0.738 | 0.689 | 0.646 | 0.639 | 0.605 | 0.569 | 0.556 | 0.524 | 0.485 | 0.452 | 0.429 | 0.365 | 0.347 | 0.311 | 0.307 | 0.277 | 0.265 | 0.239 | 0.184 | 0.170 | 0.133 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.492 | 0.078 | 0.064 | 0.063 | 0.041 | 0.035 | 0.031 | 0.024 | 0.022 | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.492 | 0.571 | 0.635 | 0.698 | 0.739 | 0.774 | 0.805 | 0.829 | 0.851 | 0.869 | 0.885 | 0.899 | 0.912 | 0.925 | 0.935 | 0.946 | 0.955 | 0.963 | 0.970 | 0.976 | 0.980 | 0.984 | 0.987 | 0.991 | 0.993 | 0.995 | 0.997 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 1 PC1: p<.0001
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 1 PC2: p=.46
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_ADCP, FHA_ADCP, PRN_ADCP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.224 | 0.986 | 0.727 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.499 | 0.324 | 0.176 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.499 | 0.824 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 2 PC1: p=.43
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 2 PC2: p=.81
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_ADNP, PT_IgG2
| PC1 | PC2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.098 | 0.891 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.603 | 0.397 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.603 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 3 PC1: p=.66
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 3 PC2: p=.29
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_IgG, FHA_IgG, PRN_IgG, PRN_IgG4, TT_IgG
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.599 | 1.003 | 0.819 | 0.666 | 0.570 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.511 | 0.201 | 0.134 | 0.089 | 0.065 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.511 | 0.712 | 0.846 | 0.935 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 4 PC1: p=.034
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 4 PC2: p=.28
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG2, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.745 | 1.077 | 1.033 | 0.764 | 0.734 | 0.592 | 0.508 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.435 | 0.166 | 0.152 | 0.083 | 0.077 | 0.050 | 0.037 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.435 | 0.601 | 0.753 | 0.836 | 0.913 | 0.963 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 5 PC1: p=.28
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 5 PC2: p=.09
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: PRN_ADNP
Features: PRN_IgG2, PT_IgG
| PC1 | PC2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.110 | 0.877 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.616 | 0.384 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.616 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 7 PC1: p<.0001
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- vaccinated RCluster_ 7 PC2: p=.15
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot
Features: PT_ADCD, PT_FcgR2a, PT_ADNP, PT_ADCP, PT_FcgR3b, PT_IgG, PT_IgG1, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, PT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.539 | 1.229 | 1.086 | 1.021 | 0.959 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.237 | 0.151 | 0.118 | 0.104 | 0.092 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.237 | 0.388 | 0.506 | 0.610 | 0.702 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PT PC1: p=.76
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PT PC2: p=.036
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
**Loadings
plot
| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PT UMAP1: p=.042
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PT UMAP2: p=.061
Features: FHA_ADCD, FHA_ADNP, FHA_ADCP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, FHA_IgG, FHA_IgG1, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, FHA_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.739 | 1.224 | 1.128 | 1.051 | 1.006 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.303 | 0.150 | 0.127 | 0.110 | 0.101 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.303 | 0.452 | 0.580 | 0.690 | 0.791 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted FHA PC1: p=.3
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted FHA PC2: p=.28
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
**Loadings
plot
| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted FHA UMAP1: p=.81
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted FHA UMAP2: p=.022
Features: PRN_ADCD, PRN_ADNP, PRN_ADCP, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PRN_IgG, PRN_IgG1, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PRN_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.541 | 1.253 | 1.104 | 1.062 | 0.996 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.237 | 0.157 | 0.122 | 0.113 | 0.099 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.237 | 0.394 | 0.516 | 0.629 | 0.728 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PRN PC1: p=.8
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PRN PC2: p=.9
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
**Loadings
plot
| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PRN UMAP1: p=.33
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted PRN UMAP2: p=.23
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_FcgR2a, DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, DT_FcgR3b, DT_IgG, DT_IgG1, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, DT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.319 | 1.286 | 1.260 | 1.104 | 1.063 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.174 | 0.165 | 0.159 | 0.122 | 0.113 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.174 | 0.339 | 0.498 | 0.620 | 0.733 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted DT PC1: p=.49
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted DT PC2: p=.86
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
**Loadings
plot
| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted DT UMAP1: p=.42
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted DT UMAP2: p=.84
Features: TT_ADCD, TT_ADCP, TT_FcgR2a, TT_IgG2, TT_ADNP, TT_FcgR3b, TT_IgG, TT_IgG1, TT_IgG4, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.362 | 1.210 | 1.153 | 1.077 | 1.039 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.185 | 0.146 | 0.133 | 0.116 | 0.108 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.185 | 0.332 | 0.465 | 0.581 | 0.689 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT PC1: p=.92
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT PC2: p=.2
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
**Loadings
plot
| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |

| Version | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 9d33ff3 | f006zvn1 | 2024-08-19 |
Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.62
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.35
Features: TT_IgG2, DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.848 | 1.159 | 1.096 | 1.038 | 0.913 | 0.889 | 0.668 | 0.566 | 0.547 | 0.522 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.342 | 0.134 | 0.120 | 0.108 | 0.083 | 0.079 | 0.045 | 0.032 | 0.030 | 0.027 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.342 | 0.476 | 0.596 | 0.704 | 0.787 | 0.866 | 0.911 | 0.943 | 0.973 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC1:
p=.39
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG2 / IgG4 PC2:
p=.092
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.33
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.14
Features: DT_ADCD, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, PT_ADCD, TT_ADCD
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.91 | 0.782 | 0.598 | 0.521 | 0.334 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.73 | 0.122 | 0.072 | 0.054 | 0.022 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.73 | 0.852 | 0.923 | 0.978 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster ADCD PC1: p=.35
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster ADCD PC2: p=.18
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.39
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.37
Features: TT_ADCP, DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, FHA_ADNP, PRN_ADNP, PT_ADNP, TT_ADNP, FHA_ADCP, PRN_ADCP, PT_ADCP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.713 | 1.376 | 1.047 | 0.994 | 0.918 | 0.792 | 0.749 | 0.731 | 0.539 | 0.482 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.293 | 0.189 | 0.110 | 0.099 | 0.084 | 0.063 | 0.056 | 0.053 | 0.029 | 0.023 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.293 | 0.483 | 0.592 | 0.691 | 0.775 | 0.838 | 0.894 | 0.948 | 0.977 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC1:
p=.58
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster ADNP / ADCP PC2:
p=.37
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.84
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.83
Features: DT_FcgR2a, PT_FcgR2a, TT_FcgR2a, DT_FcgR3b, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PT_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.115 | 1.303 | 1.148 | 1.055 | 0.747 | 0.662 | 0.416 | 0.350 | 0.243 | 0.218 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.447 | 0.170 | 0.132 | 0.111 | 0.056 | 0.044 | 0.017 | 0.012 | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.447 | 0.617 | 0.749 | 0.860 | 0.916 | 0.960 | 0.977 | 0.989 | 0.995 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC1:
p=.58
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster FcgR2a / FcgR3b PC2:
p=.73
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.68
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.097
Features: DT_IgG1, FHA_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, PT_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.780 | 0.892 | 0.699 | 0.565 | 0.479 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.634 | 0.159 | 0.098 | 0.064 | 0.046 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.634 | 0.793 | 0.890 | 0.954 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG1 PC1: p=.2
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG1 PC2: p=.11
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.96
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.14
Features: DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, PT_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.540 | 0.908 | 0.855 | 0.746 | 0.720 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.474 | 0.165 | 0.146 | 0.111 | 0.104 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.474 | 0.639 | 0.785 | 0.896 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG3 PC1: p=.62
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG3 PC2: p=.92
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.85
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.84
Features: DT_IgG, FHA_IgG, PRN_IgG, PT_IgG, TT_IgG
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.825 | 0.798 | 0.644 | 0.593 | 0.515 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.666 | 0.127 | 0.083 | 0.070 | 0.053 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.666 | 0.794 | 0.877 | 0.947 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG PC1: p=.28
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted Feature Cluster IgG PC2: p=.075
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.97
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.22
Features: DT_ADCD, DT_FcgR2a, FHA_ADCD, PRN_ADCD, PT_ADCD, PT_FcgR2a, TT_ADCD, TT_ADCP, TT_FcgR2a, TT_IgG2
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.181 | 1.156 | 0.998 | 0.956 | 0.797 | 0.649 | 0.645 | 0.500 | 0.449 | 0.269 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.476 | 0.134 | 0.100 | 0.091 | 0.064 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.025 | 0.020 | 0.007 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.476 | 0.609 | 0.709 | 0.800 | 0.864 | 0.906 | 0.948 | 0.973 | 0.993 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 1 PC1: p=.41
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 1 PC2: p=.22
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.48
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.52
Features: DT_ADCP, DT_ADNP, FHA_ADNP, PRN_ADNP, PT_ADNP, TT_ADNP
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.529 | 1.048 | 0.927 | 0.862 | 0.752 | 0.628 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.390 | 0.183 | 0.143 | 0.124 | 0.094 | 0.066 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.390 | 0.573 | 0.716 | 0.840 | 0.934 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 2 PC1: p=.7
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 2 PC2: p=.39
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.97
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.61
Features: DT_FcgR3b, FHA_ADCP, FHA_FcgR2a, FHA_FcgR3b, PRN_ADCP, PRN_FcgR2a, PRN_FcgR3b, PT_ADCP, PT_FcgR3b, TT_FcgR3b
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 2.094 | 1.328 | 1.033 | 0.976 | 0.853 | 0.657 | 0.543 | 0.473 | 0.297 | 0.257 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.438 | 0.176 | 0.107 | 0.095 | 0.073 | 0.043 | 0.030 | 0.022 | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.438 | 0.615 | 0.722 | 0.817 | 0.890 | 0.933 | 0.962 | 0.985 | 0.993 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 3 PC1: p=.35
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 3 PC2: p=.33
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.87
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.72
Features: DT_IgG, FHA_IgG, PRN_IgG, PT_IgG, TT_IgG
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.825 | 0.798 | 0.644 | 0.593 | 0.515 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.666 | 0.127 | 0.083 | 0.070 | 0.053 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.666 | 0.794 | 0.877 | 0.947 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 4 PC1: p=.28
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 4 PC2: p=.075
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.97
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.22
Features: DT_IgG1, FHA_IgG1, PRN_IgG1, PT_IgG1, TT_IgG1
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.780 | 0.892 | 0.699 | 0.565 | 0.479 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.634 | 0.159 | 0.098 | 0.064 | 0.046 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.634 | 0.793 | 0.890 | 0.954 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 5 PC1: p=.2
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 5 PC2: p=.11
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.96
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.14
Features: DT_IgG2, DT_IgG4, FHA_IgG2, FHA_IgG4, PRN_IgG2, PRN_IgG4, PT_IgG2, PT_IgG4, TT_IgG4
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.823 | 1.141 | 1.039 | 0.995 | 0.900 | 0.692 | 0.635 | 0.560 | 0.546 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.369 | 0.145 | 0.120 | 0.110 | 0.090 | 0.053 | 0.045 | 0.035 | 0.033 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.369 | 0.514 | 0.634 | 0.744 | 0.834 | 0.887 | 0.932 | 0.967 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 6 PC1: p=.43
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 6 PC2: p=.044
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.79
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.12
Features: DT_IgG3, FHA_IgG3, PRN_IgG3, PT_IgG3, TT_IgG3
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 1.540 | 0.908 | 0.855 | 0.746 | 0.720 |
| Proportion of Variance | 0.474 | 0.165 | 0.146 | 0.111 | 0.104 |
| Cumulative Proportion | 0.474 | 0.639 | 0.785 | 0.896 | 1.000 |


Comparison of principle components by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 7 PC1: p=.62
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted RCluster_ 7 PC2: p=.92
Correlation between features and each PC score - colored by
variance contribution

**Loadings
plot

Comparison of UMAP loadings by arm
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP1: p=.85
Maternal Tdap+ vs. Tdap- boosted TT UMAP2: p=.84
sessionInfo()
R version 4.4.2 (2024-10-31)
Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20
Running under: macOS Sequoia 15.1.1
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib; LAPACK version 3.12.0
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
time zone: America/New_York
tzcode source: internal
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] e1071_1.7-16 glue_1.8.0 RPostgres_1.4.7
[4] magrittr_2.0.3 broom.helpers_1.17.0 broom_1.0.7
[7] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 skimr_2.1.5 rmarkdown_2.28
[10] papeR_1.0-5 xtable_1.8-4 car_3.1-3
[13] carData_3.0-5 corrplot_0.94 rempsyc_0.1.8
[16] FactoMineR_2.11 factoextra_1.0.7 rstatix_0.7.2
[19] umap_0.2.10.0 pracma_2.4.4 PCAmixdata_3.1
[22] qgraph_1.9.8 kableExtra_1.4.0 gtsummary_2.0.3
[25] gtExtras_0.5.0 gt_0.11.1 ggfortify_0.4.17
[28] ggpubr_0.6.0 ggExtra_0.10.1 ggrepel_0.9.6
[31] janitor_2.2.0 here_1.0.1 data.table_1.16.2
[34] DT_0.33 DBI_1.2.3 fpc_2.2-13
[37] lubridate_1.9.3 forcats_1.0.0 stringr_1.5.1
[40] dplyr_1.1.4 purrr_1.0.2 readr_2.1.5
[43] tidyr_1.3.1 tibble_3.2.1 ggplot2_3.5.1
[46] tidyverse_2.0.0
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] splines_4.4.2 later_1.3.2 rpart_4.1.23
[4] lifecycle_1.0.4 rprojroot_2.0.4 lattice_0.22-6
[7] prabclus_2.3-4 MASS_7.3-61 flashClust_1.01-2
[10] backports_1.5.0 Hmisc_5.1-3 sass_0.4.9
[13] jquerylib_0.1.4 yaml_2.3.10 httpuv_1.6.15
[16] flexmix_2.3-19 askpass_1.2.1 reticulate_1.39.0
[19] pbapply_1.7-2 multcomp_1.4-26 abind_1.4-8
[22] quadprog_1.5-8 TH.data_1.1-2 nnet_7.3-19
[25] sandwich_3.1-1 git2r_0.33.0 gmodels_2.19.1
[28] gdata_3.0.0 RSpectra_0.16-2 svglite_2.1.3
[31] codetools_0.2-20 xml2_1.3.6 tidyselect_1.2.1
[34] farver_2.1.2 stats4_4.4.2 base64enc_0.1-3
[37] jsonlite_1.8.9 Formula_1.2-5 survival_3.7-0
[40] emmeans_1.10.4 systemfonts_1.1.0 tools_4.4.2
[43] Rcpp_1.0.13 mnormt_2.1.1 gridExtra_2.3
[46] xfun_0.48 withr_3.0.1 fastmap_1.2.0
[49] fansi_1.0.6 openssl_2.2.2 digest_0.6.37
[52] timechange_0.3.0 R6_2.5.1 mime_0.12
[55] estimability_1.5.1 colorspace_2.1-1 gtools_3.9.5
[58] jpeg_0.1-10 diptest_0.77-1 utf8_1.2.4
[61] generics_0.1.3 corpcor_1.6.10 robustbase_0.99-4-1
[64] class_7.3-22 htmlwidgets_1.6.4 scatterplot3d_0.3-44
[67] whisker_0.4.1 pkgconfig_2.0.3 gtable_0.3.5
[70] modeltools_0.2-23 blob_1.2.4 workflowr_1.7.1
[73] htmltools_0.5.8.1 lavaan_0.6-19 multcompView_0.1-10
[76] scales_1.3.0 leaps_3.2 png_0.1-8
[79] snakecase_0.11.1 knitr_1.48.1 rstudioapi_0.16.0
[82] tzdb_0.4.0 reshape2_1.4.4 coda_0.19-4.1
[85] checkmate_2.3.2 nlme_3.1-166 proxy_0.4-27
[88] repr_1.1.7 zoo_1.8-12 cachem_1.1.0
[91] parallel_4.4.2 miniUI_0.1.1.1 foreign_0.8-87
[94] pillar_1.9.0 grid_4.4.2 vctrs_0.6.5
[97] promises_1.3.0 cluster_2.1.6 htmlTable_2.4.3
[100] paletteer_1.6.0 evaluate_1.0.1 pbivnorm_0.6.0
[103] mvtnorm_1.3-1 cli_3.6.3 compiler_4.4.2
[106] rlang_1.1.4 ggsignif_0.6.4 labeling_0.4.3
[109] fdrtool_1.2.18 mclust_6.1.1 rematch2_2.1.2
[112] plyr_1.8.9 fs_1.6.4 stringi_1.8.4
[115] psych_2.4.6.26 viridisLite_0.4.2 munsell_0.5.1
[118] Matrix_1.7-1 hms_1.1.3 glasso_1.11
[121] bit64_4.5.2 shiny_1.9.1 highr_0.11
[124] kernlab_0.9-33 fontawesome_0.5.2 igraph_2.0.3
[127] bslib_0.8.0 bit_4.5.0 DEoptimR_1.1-3