User Tools

Site Tools


analysis:nsb2016:week6

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
analysis:nsb2016:week6 [2016/07/04 18:40]
mvdm created
analysis:nsb2016:week6 [2018/07/07 10:19] (current)
Line 431: Line 431:
 ☛ What strategies can you think of to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the above detection? How might the workflow be improved? ☛ What strategies can you think of to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the above detection? How might the workflow be improved?
  
 +=== Optional extra: inspecting detected events with spectrograms ===
 +
 +<code matlab>
 +% TFR version -- make sure FieldTrip is added to your path (see Module 1)
 +cfg_convert = []; cfg_convert.mode = '​resample';​
 +csc_ft = TSDtoFT(cfg_convert,​csc);​ & convert tsd to FieldTrip format
 +            ​
 +evt_temp = evt; % FieldTrip assumes everything starts at time 0
 +evt_temp.tstart = evt_temp.tstart-csc.tvec(1);​
 +evt_temp.tend = evt_temp.tend-csc.tvec(1);​
 +
 +cfg_temp = []; cfg_temp.foi = 1:5:300; cfg_temp.clim = [0 10^-9]; cfg_temp.twin = [-0.1 0.1];
 +PlotTSDfromIV_TFR(cfg_temp,​evt_temp,​csc_ft);​
 +</​code>​
analysis/nsb2016/week6.1467672029.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/07/07 10:19 (external edit)