This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
guides:clustering [2013/08/19 16:27] mvdm created |
guides:clustering [2018/07/07 10:19] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=== Rating system === | === Rating system === | ||
- | * 1: Ideal cluster, tight and well isolated. The sort you would use as an example of what you'd like everything to look like. | + | * 1: Great cluster, tight and well isolated. The sort you would use as an example of what you'd like everything to look like. |
- | * 2: Very good cluster, a few points of contamination. | + | * 2: Very good cluster, a few points of contamination and/or touching edges |
- | * 3: Good cluster, some contamination and edges that may be touching, but no major defects. | + | * 3: Solid cluster, some contamination and slightly overlapping edges, but no major defects. |
* 4: Borderline cluster with some issues, e.g. diffuse, may be 2 cells, hard to separate in a principled way from neighbors. | * 4: Borderline cluster with some issues, e.g. diffuse, may be 2 cells, hard to separate in a principled way from neighbors. | ||
* 5: Cluster with defects. This is not included by default and will only be accessible when overridden (e.g. for decoding analysis) | * 5: Cluster with defects. This is not included by default and will only be accessible when overridden (e.g. for decoding analysis) | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
By default ratings of 1-4 will be analyzed, and as an extra check only 1-3 can be done to help determine robustness of results to clustering errors. | By default ratings of 1-4 will be analyzed, and as an extra check only 1-3 can be done to help determine robustness of results to clustering errors. | ||
- | Note: these are *not* relative ratings, i.e. if all your tetrodes are messy you don't give the best cells a "1" rating! | + | Note: these are *not* relative ratings, i.e. if all your tetrodes are messy and there aren't any genuine "1s" then you don't give the best cells a "1" rating just because they are the best of a bad lot! |