analysis:course-w16:week10
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
analysis:course-w16:week10 [2016/02/15 10:18] mvdm [Estimating tuning curves] |
analysis:course-w16:week10 [2016/02/16 14:01] mvdm [Quantifying decoding accuracy] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 481: | Line 481: | ||
| % get trial id for each sample | % get trial id for each sample | ||
| trial_id = zeros(size(Q_tvec_centers)); | trial_id = zeros(size(Q_tvec_centers)); | ||
| - | trial_idx = nearest_idx3(run_start,Q_tvec_centers); % NOTE: on non-Windows, use nearest_idx.m | + | trial_idx = nearest_idx3(metadata.taskvars.trial_iv.tstart,Q_tvec_centers); % NOTE: on non-Windows, use nearest_idx.m |
| trial_id(trial_idx) = 1; | trial_id(trial_idx) = 1; | ||
| trial_id = cumsum(trial_id); | trial_id = cumsum(trial_id); | ||
| Line 497: | Line 497: | ||
| {{ :analysis:course-w16:dec_err.png?nolink&600 |}} | {{ :analysis:course-w16:dec_err.png?nolink&600 |}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Note, your plot might look a little different.) | ||
| Thus, on average our estimate is 2.14 pixels away from the true position. Earlier laps seem to have some more outliers of bins where our estimate is bad (large distance) but there is no obvious trend across laps visible. | Thus, on average our estimate is 2.14 pixels away from the true position. Earlier laps seem to have some more outliers of bins where our estimate is bad (large distance) but there is no obvious trend across laps visible. | ||
analysis/course-w16/week10.txt ยท Last modified: 2018/07/07 10:19 (external edit)
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
